The Dictionary of Sydney was archived in 2021.
Murder most foul: the Sussex Street Mystery
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd013/bd013cfbb6a9da4b1bc37bb0f3aaa4320b077e07" alt="New South Wales Government Gazette, September 21, 1866. p 2194 via Trove"
Listen to Catie and Tess on 2SER here
On Saturday 15 September 1866, eleven-year-old James Kirkpatrick took his playful Newfoundland pup out for a morning walk. He opened the wooden back yard door of his home in Sussex Street, crossed the vacant land, which lay immediately behind his parent’s house and headed down towards the busy working harbour. In the 1860s the area at the rear of Sussex Street, between Bathurst and Liverpool streets, was a mishmash of factories, mills, wharves, and wasteland. The wasteland was used as a thoroughfare by the mill and factory workers and as a smouldering tip for industrial scraps and nearby household refuse. As James approached the rubbish heap, his dog began to bark and scratch at it ‘in a very excited sort of manner. Thinking he had found a rat, young James crouched down to take a closer look. To his horror, the puppy had not found a rat but the severed head of a dark-haired woman whose tongue was protruding outwards. Terrified, James quickly ran home to tell his father, who reported the find to the Central Police Station on George Street. The police were soon on the scene. A few yards from the severed head they discovered the partial, charred and decomposing remains of an armless torso. With no limbs found and no additional evidence of note, the remains were sent to the Dead House at the Benevolent Asylum, on the corner of Pitt and Devonshire Streets. Here, the medical officer of the Asylum, Dr Arthur Renwick, examined them and estimated that the deceased had been dead for two to three weeks. The sensational news of the ‘foul deed’ and ‘fiendish act’ quickly spread across the city. But who was the woman and where was the rest of her body? And what would the coroner’s inquest reveal? The inquest was held, as inquests were at the time, in a pub, and it was rather gruesome. For an inquest to be legally valid at the time, a body had to be present, so Dr Renwick showed the jury the skull and lower jaw. He said the remains belonged to a middle-aged woman of large bones and build, with a long nose and dark hair, that the injuries to the head would have caused immediate death and that they had been inflicted during life. The body had been deprived of its limbs and this had ‘unquestionably been performed by a person or persons having some acquaintance with the anatomy of the body and exhibited a certain amount of skill, especially in the mode in which the neck had been severed.’ Given that this was all before the development of forensic and medical science as we know it today, his deductions were remarkable. The jury found, unsurprisingly, that a murder had taken place, by person or persons unknown and the colonial government offered a reward for further information.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/587e8/587e86b0d4da57435718f05983e70f95b5a7c03c" alt="William Henry Scott, from 'History of the Sussex St. murder', Sydney 1867, State Library of NSW (PAM 86/565)"
Categories
Blog
2ser
Annie Scott
Arthur Renwick
bigamy
butcher
Catie Gilchrist
coroner
murder
Shiell
Sussex Street
sydney history
Tess Connery
true crime
William Scott